BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//STEP Australia - ECPv6.17.4.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:STEP Australia
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://stepaustralia.com
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for STEP Australia
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20250101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20260916T173000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20260916T183000
DTSTAMP:20260827T045356Z
CREATED:20260827T045356Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260827T045356Z
UID:111122-1789579800-1789583400@stepaustralia.com
SUMMARY:STEP NSW Evening Seminar | Wednesday 16 September 2026
DESCRIPTION:STEP NSW Evening Seminar | Wednesday 16 September 2026\nSTEP NSW Branch invites you to a seminar with Denis Barlin TEP\, Barrister\, 13 Wentworth Selborne Chambers. \nTopic: Setting aside transactions made by trustees: mistakes\, rectification and not having regard to relevant considerations \nMuch has been said in relation to seeking a review\, and setting aside of\, discretionary decisions of trustees\, such as in Owies v JJE Nominees Pty Ltd [2022] VSCA 142 and Karger v Paul [1984] VR 161. \nThis seminar considers the defective exercise of powers by a trustee and when the outcome and consequence of such an exercise may be set aside. Particular regard is given to: \n(a) mistakes made by trustees (and where recission may be sought); \n(b) rectification of written instruments; and \n(c) where a trustee exercises a power in the context of inadequate consideration being given by a trustee. \nWhilst\, when exercising a power\, a trustee may have a duty to have regard to relevant considerations\, that duty in some circumstances may extend to considering the consequences of a proposed exercise of a power in a particular way\, and not merely its nature or legal effect. Where the effect or consequences of the exercise of a power by a trustee are not fully appreciated by a trustee\, when the consequences should have been then the principles in Pitt v Holt [2013] 2 AC 108 may apply (which itself was a watering down of the “rule” in Re Hastings-Bass). \nEvent Details \nDate: Wednesday 16 September 2026 \nTime: 17:30 – 18:30 AEST \nVenue: Court 13A\, Supreme Court of New South Wales (in person and online via live-stream) \nCost: STEP Members $75 | Non-Members $120 \nFor further information or assistance\, please contact stepnswaustralia@step.org \nREGISTER HERE\n  \nSeminar Sponsor | Perpetual \nPerpetual Wealth has earned the trust of Australians for over 140 years\, our trustee heritage has shaped a culture built on putting clients first. We protect and grow wealth to create enduring prosperity across generations. Perpetual Wealth delivers tailored\, holistic financial advice for individuals\, families and community organisations\, addressing complex needs at every life stage. Our services include superannuation\, retirement planning\, investment\, asset protection\, insurance\, tax\, aged care\, succession planning and philanthropy. As one of Australia’s largest managers of philanthropic funds\, we manage around 1\,000 charitable trusts supporting diverse causes. Our fiduciary heritage and investment expertise make us a trusted partner for long-term wealth management. \nLearn more
URL:https://stepaustralia.com/events/step-nsw-evening-seminar-wednesday-16-september-2026/
LOCATION:Court 13A\, Supreme Court of New South Wales\, 184 Phillip St\, Sydney\, NSW\, 2000
CATEGORIES:Live Stream,Seminar,STEP New South Wales,Webinar
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR